Jump to content


Linux not so safe


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Neon

Neon

    Karl

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,728 posts
  • Country:Space

Posted 08 November 2005 - 05:47 PM

We all agree on one thing, most virus' attack WINDOWS or MS products because they dominate the market.

Well it's not a shock that since Linux has gotten more popular, the Virus writing idiots that we all want to kill aimed their sites for Linux.

KA'BLOOM there goes the gnoppix penguin? J/K.

Ok so want some geeky tech info on this thing?

The worm that affects Linux systems and spreads by exploiting Web server-related vulnerabilities has been reported by antivirus companies, but so far Linux.Plupii, which is also known as Lupper, hasn’t spread much and isn’t seen as much of a threat.

The worm, discovered Sunday, attacks Web servers by sending malicious HTTP requests on Port 80, McAfee said. If the server being targeted is running a vulnerable script at certain URLs and is configured to permit external shell commands and remote file download in PHP/CGI, the worm could be downloaded and executed, McAfee said. It can also harvest e-mail addresses stored in Web server files

#2 ShadowFox

ShadowFox

    High Priest

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,969 posts
  • Location:Tempe, AZ
  • Interests:An abundance :P
  • Country:United States

Posted 08 November 2005 - 06:26 PM

ohh great, if it's not hard enough setting up my linux webserver now I have to update and keep my virus scanning software going, more configuration -.-

Thank @$$%^$!*

#3 RedInferno

RedInferno

    Your mom

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,584 posts
  • Location:What's it to ya, bub?
  • Country:North America

Posted 08 November 2005 - 06:56 PM

Well, I'd have to say WIndows is a lot more prompt with their patchesm, and altough lInux is great it is mostly open source, if they are targeted the emergency response will be mich worse.

#4 Neon

Neon

    Karl

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,728 posts
  • Country:Space

Posted 08 November 2005 - 07:58 PM

That, i suppose is the downside.

If something is FREE then you ain't paying for a service!

#5 Visentinel

Visentinel

    Established Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 998 posts
  • Location:NSW Australia

Posted 09 November 2005 - 06:15 AM

in some cases it can be said windows is more secure than Linux coz it isn't open source and so its harder to find vuln's

Linux is not a popular target so all thought it may have even more holes than windows, no one is really looking for them

#6 RedInferno

RedInferno

    Your mom

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,584 posts
  • Location:What's it to ya, bub?
  • Country:North America

Posted 09 November 2005 - 01:49 PM

View PostKW13, on Nov 8 2005, 01:58 PM, said:

That, i suppose is the downside.

If something is FREE then you ain't paying for a service!
It should be ALL free...that's what I pay my taxes for...oh wait, they're not the government :P




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users