Jump to content


- - - - -

Google Chrome, already reasons to avoid!


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 03 September 2008 - 05:21 PM

images/news/google.jpgAs reported yesterday, Google has released the first beta of their new web browser, Google Chrome. Within a day of its release, there are already a couple of points that users should be cautioned of before using this new browser.

The first, is the popular "carpet bomb" vulnerability that still exists within Chrome, as pointed out on Neowin. This vulnerability allows malicious websites to drive by download and execute programs on your machine. Our visitors may remember the uproar that this same vulnerability caused for Safari users, and that Apple patched the carpet-bombing issue with Safari v3.1.2. Chrome is vulnerable to this exploit because it is based on the same engine, WebKit 525.13, and Google did not patch or update the engine before releasing the software.

The other, and less technical, problem with Chrome exists in its EULA. More specifically, the point that would seem to give Google rights to anything you post on the Internet while using their browser, mostly in conjunction with the promotion of its services.

"By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the services and may be revoked for certain services as defined in the additional terms of those services." Not exactly something you're used to seeing in a web browser's license agreement.

There is also the point that Google reserves the right to automatically update and install Chrome. Interesting, "the software which you use may automatically download and install updates from time to time from Google. These updates are designed to improve, enhance and further develop the services and may take the form of bug fixes, enhanced functions, new software modules and completely new versions. You agree to receive such updates (and permit Google to deliver these to you) as part of your use of the services." ... so says the EULA.

Now we're all used to seeing automatic update functions built into software. It seems that almost anything you install these days has one. However, very few demand that I install their updates. What if I don't want to because the new version includes a bug or breaks something else on my computer? Although, one would hope that they'd use this automatic update feature to fix the flaw pointed out above.

Google Chrome EULA


:foldon2km4:


#2 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,810 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 03 September 2008 - 05:55 PM

although i love the speed and all, i can't seem to turn off javascript, which i really like having control over, and the lack of adblocking in the browser itself is getting annoying, so i think for now i'm going to run ff, as in it ain't broke :foldon2km4:

#3 brewin

brewin

    Victory is mine!

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,261 posts
  • Location:Missouri
  • Interests:Anything interesting.
  • Country:USA

Posted 03 September 2008 - 07:22 PM

If you build it yourself, you don't have to agree to the EULA.

http://dev.chromium....getting-started


By the way, I noticed that Chrome isn't installed in "Program Files (x86)" or "Program Files". For some reason it installs itself to the user's "Local Settings/Application Data" folder. I can't imagine why.

#4 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,810 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 03 September 2008 - 08:54 PM

View Postbrewin, on Sep 3 2008, 12:22 PM, said:

If you build it yourself, you don't have to agree to the EULA.

http://dev.chromium....getting-started


By the way, I noticed that Chrome isn't installed in "Program Files (x86)" or "Program Files". For some reason it installs itself to the user's "Local Settings/Application Data" folder. I can't imagine why.

i noticed the non entry in program files...brew, can you build us a 64bit.net version? :foldon2km4:

#5 brewin

brewin

    Victory is mine!

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,261 posts
  • Location:Missouri
  • Interests:Anything interesting.
  • Country:USA

Posted 03 September 2008 - 10:00 PM

Actually, I just found this. Binary snapshots of Chromium. Just unzip chrome-win32.zip and run. No installation and no EULA.

#6 Nvyseal

Nvyseal

    Chairman of the Board

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,802 posts
  • Location:From the whatever it is, Pluto
  • Country:USA

Posted 03 September 2008 - 10:03 PM

Google has responded with haste to the huge outcry about a section in Chrome's EULA that gives Google "a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license" to do all kinds of dirty stuff—in public no less—to content you post through Chrome. Rebecca Ward, Senior Product Counsel for Google Chrome, told Ars that it's actually an oopsie from basically copying and pasting the same EULA it uses in other products, and that they're updating it as fast as they can to remove the ridiculous terms.

She says that Google is:

Quote

working quickly to remove language from Section 11 of the current Google Chrome terms of service. This change will apply retroactively to all users who have downloaded Google Chrome

It's not that I don't trust Google, but the Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V explanation ("this means that the legal terms for a specific product may include terms that don't apply well to the use of that product") seems like an odd oversight for a product in secret, heavy development for close to two years. (If you're interested in Chrome, read Steven Levy's deep inside feature about its birth, it's great.)

Either way, whether Google knew it was in there and hoped it would slide—though I can't see a reason for that—or it was an honest mistake, it'll be fixed soon.

Gizmodo via Ars

#7 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,810 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 03 September 2008 - 10:50 PM

thanks guys. hey brew, that link is awesome, has the latest builds.sweet :foldon2km4:

#8 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,810 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 03 September 2008 - 10:55 PM

they have changed the icon too, it is shades of blue and gray, at least in this build.

#9 VROSA

VROSA

    Ghost Member

  • Global Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,043 posts
  • Location:Belo Horizonte - Minas Gerais - Brazil
  • Interests:Hardware, Software, Alphas and Betas, OS Mods, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Linux, Games, Fun, Friends.
  • Country:Brazil

Posted 04 September 2008 - 03:11 PM

Thanks for the link Brewin,

i got build 1706


:foldon2km4:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users