

Windows Server 2008 is 20% faster than Vista
#76
Posted 27 March 2008 - 12:00 AM
#77 Guest_scaramonga_*
Posted 27 March 2008 - 01:07 AM


About
It ain't all that bad once you have it configured properly. Threatsense, HTTP checking, Scan on boot/shutdown, Scan on file creation & network - All disabled.
Used it for years, full copy on my server (latest)

S.
Edited by scaramonga, 27 March 2008 - 01:08 AM.
#78
Posted 27 March 2008 - 01:17 AM
scaramonga, on Mar 26 2008, 06:07 PM, said:


About
It ain't all that bad once you have it configured properly. Threatsense, HTTP checking, Scan on boot/shutdown, Scan on file creation & network - All disabled.
Used it for years, full copy on my server (latest)

S.
LOL...Why do I suddenly feel like I'm going to be doing a 3 way AV comparison on WS2k08??? Good thing I have a fresh install image of ws2k08 cuz unless things have changed once Symantec pollutes your registry, it stays polluted after the uninstall.

#79
Posted 27 March 2008 - 01:43 AM
scaramonga, on Mar 26 2008, 06:07 PM, said:


...full copy on my server (latest)


WFO, on Mar 26 2008, 06:17 PM, said:



#80 Guest_scaramonga_*
Posted 27 March 2008 - 01:55 AM
Quote

SSL/TTL remember MO


#81
Posted 27 March 2008 - 02:54 AM

#82
Posted 27 March 2008 - 04:19 AM
#83
Posted 27 March 2008 - 05:34 AM

edit: the system boots as if there is no av installed: in other words, very fast. this is what i wanted: nod (previous version, non multi), and it to work in server.
#84
Posted 27 March 2008 - 07:34 AM
#85
Posted 28 March 2008 - 06:56 AM


#87
Posted 28 March 2008 - 10:41 PM
m.oreilly, on Mar 26 2008, 09:19 PM, said:
Ummm...whats hyper -v???


I'm currently in Vista because my virtual machines kept locking up in Server despite backing off the clock 150mhz.


#89
Posted 29 March 2008 - 06:36 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users