Jump to content


The primaries and caucuses in the States


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

Poll: Who do you support?

Pick your candidate.

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#16 talker

talker

    Being a Priest is not always easy.

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 840 posts
  • Location:Huntville, AL, USA
  • Interests:Ah lets see...gee, I know...computers.
  • Country:USA

Posted 21 January 2008 - 02:09 PM

View Postbluerip, on Jan 21 2008, 12:11 AM, said:

an insider leaked that the Bilderbergers intend Clinton to be president next.

Even if an apparent true believer(in the constitution) gets elected by some fluke of an honest vote...

I am not sure that I can concede the existance of a global Bildeberger type organization yet I will admit to some credence of a national (read United States) group. I don't feel that Clinton would be the pick of this group. I believe they need someone more pliable (usable) than Clinton can or will be. I have an opinion as to whom but will not state that here.

And as for an honest election, I fear that has not occurred since, perhaps, the election of Eisenhower in 1952. I am not a defeatist concerning American politics but have long feared that our single nor combined votes really mean little. There is enough coordination in this national organitzation to not allow an extreme landslide in the voting. A close vote is much easier to manipulate and to sell to the populace. Even were an "honest" candidate happen to make it into the Whitehouse it would be of little concern. There is enough influence outside the Whitehouse to more that run damage control and maintain the organization's background control. An "honest" or uncooperative President would be, at most, a minor inconvenience to the group. A democracy requires less power to control than a dictatorship. You allow the people to go about the motions of democracy and they are satisfied (see sig quote). If an individual or group goes too far, an agency like Homeland Security will move in to redirect or even silence the problem. As most of you know, I have had a run in with Homeland Security concerning things that I have written not being allowed to be published.

Well, I guess it is time to yeild this soapbox to someone else. Please consider that these opinions are mine and don't neccesarily, in anyway, represent the views of the forum or anyone connected to the forum. These views I voice in print and verbally when I see a discussion that warrants the opportunity...talker. :giggle:

Edited by talker, 22 January 2008 - 01:04 AM.


#17 RJsPC

RJsPC

    Sponge Bob Guru Pants

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 435 posts
  • Location:Santa Cruz CA
  • Country:USA

Posted 21 January 2008 - 04:39 PM

Oh sure, get all serious and talk about reality, where is the fun in that

I'm pulling the wool back over my eye's, ah thats better, all warm and fuzzy inside, think I need some microwave brownies and milk too

#18 Camaro

Camaro

    Established Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 907 posts
  • Country:USA

Posted 21 January 2008 - 04:48 PM

well spoken talker, as always.

#19 bluerip

bluerip

    BS Meter embedded, BS attached

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 741 posts
  • Location:Arnoldland
  • Interests:All things SciFi, Hidden Science,& Hiddin Truth
  • Country:& western, jazz, rock, all

Posted 22 January 2008 - 05:18 AM

understood.

Never the less they (the One World, Globalists) will have their puppet.

I'm just saying, "Bendover cuz here it comes again!" Thats if you are taking this all seriously.
You shouldn't. Just sit back and watch the show. Realize they are all full of it.
Then go about doing the right thing. Don't give them any creedance. Do what you know is the right thing.
The bad guys will dry up and blow away.
But if you beleive the bad guys you will bendover.
SO DON'T! :giggle:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users