i now have a worthless (yes, sorry linus) raptor, my scsi controller is in a truck somewhere, on it's way to an rma, so now i'm running my workstation from an 8 year old pata. talk about "newer isn't always better". this is really weird...
OH God...not again...
Started by
m.oreilly
, Oct 24 2007 02:20 AM
14 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 24 October 2007 - 02:20 AM
i now have a worthless (yes, sorry linus) raptor, my scsi controller is in a truck somewhere, on it's way to an rma, so now i'm running my workstation from an 8 year old pata. talk about "newer isn't always better". this is really weird...
#2
Posted 24 October 2007 - 02:29 AM
Mo, Have you considered a buying a MAC?
#5
Posted 24 October 2007 - 03:36 AM
ROFL!!! Need to learn to leave well enough alone. I don't understand the need to install a new operating system every other day.
#7
Posted 24 October 2007 - 04:49 AM
My first and only Linux experience (fedora core 3 I believe) ended with Linux taking over my drive Vista-style. I'm sure I don't have as much of the kah-nowledge as you Mo-man, but if Linux will install but Windows won't could Linux have just sent its slimy grub of death into your shiznot? Did you try nuking the drive and starting over? Why am I up this late?
#8
Posted 24 October 2007 - 06:12 AM
hehe, i'm so used to raid, i dunno what is what
i bet if the drive was in an array, and had it's @$$ cleared, it would behave...?
#9
Posted 24 October 2007 - 05:10 PM
#10
Posted 24 October 2007 - 06:34 PM
thanks strom, but after i posted last night, i got to thinking: maybe i should activate the nvraid, and stick the drive in it as a jbod. sure enough, it fired right up, and is now running tops.
weird, that i'd have to do this, but it shows that the 2200 chipset, which the main sata ports run off of (i believe) is aok (might of got the nvram dirty somewhere, i dunno...). i don't really know why it refused to boot as a stand alone drive, or why the system refused to even allow xp a gander at it's guts. weird, i tell ya
weird, that i'd have to do this, but it shows that the 2200 chipset, which the main sata ports run off of (i believe) is aok (might of got the nvram dirty somewhere, i dunno...). i don't really know why it refused to boot as a stand alone drive, or why the system refused to even allow xp a gander at it's guts. weird, i tell ya
#11
Posted 25 October 2007 - 01:30 AM
Glad u got your Raptor going again.
The same thing happened to me a couple times and I did what Nuel suggested-- worked great.
I always use an older hard drive to experiment with Linux now- I leave my Raid arrays alone with the main OS.
The same thing happened to me a couple times and I did what Nuel suggested-- worked great.
I always use an older hard drive to experiment with Linux now- I leave my Raid arrays alone with the main OS.
#12
Posted 25 October 2007 - 02:44 AM
Roadrunner, on Oct 24 2007, 06:30 PM, said:
Glad u got your Raptor going again.
The same thing happened to me a couple times and I did what Nuel suggested-- worked great.
I always use an older hard drive to experiment with Linux now- I leave my Raid arrays alone with the main OS.

The same thing happened to me a couple times and I did what Nuel suggested-- worked great.
I always use an older hard drive to experiment with Linux now- I leave my Raid arrays alone with the main OS.
with an array, just deleting it solves issues i've had in the past. seems it's just a stand alone drive that gets the funk. i didn't know about the method strom posted. i'll have to remember that one
#13
Posted 25 October 2007 - 03:53 AM
#14
Posted 25 October 2007 - 04:53 AM
stormrosson, on Oct 24 2007, 08:53 PM, said:
#15
Posted 25 October 2007 - 04:53 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











