Jump to content


Google 'planning total storage'


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Neon

Neon

    Karl

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,728 posts
  • Country:Space

Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:14 AM

Web giant Google is planning a massive online storage facility to encompass all users' files, it is reported.
The plans were allegedly revealed accidentally after a blogger spotted notes in a slideshow presentation wrongly published on Google's site.


The GDrive, previously the subject of chatroom rumour, would offer a mirror of users' hard drives, Reuters said. Google declined to comment on the reports but said the slide notes had now been deleted.

In the notes, chief executive Eric Schmidt reportedly said Google's aim was to "store 100%" of users' information. The notes said: "With infinite storage, we can house all user files, including e-mails, web history, pictures, bookmarks, etc; and make it accessible from anywhere (any device, any platform, etc)."

No announcement

"We deleted the slide notes because they were not intended for publication," Google spokeswoman Lynn Fox said.

"We are constantly working on new ways to enhance our products and services for users, but have nothing to announce at this time."

Under the alleged scheme, if users suffered a crash and lost files, Google's own computers would have kept a back-up. The plan for total online storage could meet difficulties with bandwidth constraints for some users. The search giant recently decided to offer an optional facility that stores a copy of the text-based sections of each user's data on Google's own computers.

Now thing is for me, is that i wouldn't use this as a final storage solution. Its my stuff and if i take it elsewhere i got a laptop, USB Storage Device, a great remote desktop app, a private Server with unlimited space and bandwith. It's something new but the idea seems vague and doesn't seem all that useful.

#2 ShadowFox

ShadowFox

    High Priest

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,969 posts
  • Location:Tempe, AZ
  • Interests:An abundance :P
  • Country:United States

Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:54 PM

Sounds cool in cocept but I'm not too sure that's such a good idea O.o

#3 Sphere

Sphere

    The moth next to my brain is Bart, say hi to him if you like

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,355 posts
  • Location:*tap* Behind ya!
  • Interests:I'm a Dutchy, that means I'm not a German (which doesn't sound/look the same to me!) also, being a Dutchy means I'm an idiot... sort off!

    And I def. need to get a real life again... I'm bored with my current life, ideas can be pm'd to me!
  • Country:Dutchyland

Posted 08 March 2006 - 02:25 PM

I don't like stuff stored on a remote pc... except for websites'n things then

#4 patman174

patman174

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 217 posts

Posted 08 March 2006 - 10:56 PM

Yeah, im not a fan of that myself. I wouldnt mind being able to upload whatever I wanted, but not putting everything. That would take forever.

#5 Mr Bad Guy

Mr Bad Guy

    No more Mr Nice Guy!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 365 posts
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Football, music, movies (cinemas), friends, girls.
  • Country:United Kingdom, England

Posted 09 March 2006 - 12:01 PM

The only thing that I save online is pics that are very important to me. I use AOL or Yahoo to do dat.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users