For me the slowest was an old 233MHz dell with 64mb ram, it worked but logon took 5 mins...it was sloooow.
0
The slowest pc you put XP on?
Started by
Neon
, Jan 04 2006 05:39 PM
4 replies to this topic
#2
RedInferno
-
- Members
-
- 2,584 posts
Your mom
- Location:What's it to ya, bub?
- Country:North America
Posted 04 January 2006 - 07:13 PM
LOL, the slowest is my 2.4 ghz dell 
I started out with Macs, didn't get a PC until 2000.
Double post fixed - kw13
I started out with Macs, didn't get a PC until 2000.
Double post fixed - kw13
#3
gamer_pro_2000
-
- Members
-
- 108 posts
Advanced Member
- Location:Michigan, USA
- Country:United States
Posted 04 January 2006 - 08:44 PM
The slowest machine I put XP on was a machine that was rnuning at 500mhz overclocked with 64 mb of RAM and a 16mb Video card, lol.
#4
Neon
-
- Members
-
- 4,728 posts
Karl
- Country:Space
Posted 05 January 2006 - 12:09 AM
The processor is actually ok, its the RAM.
i had a Pentium II 300Mhz with 128mb that ran XP really well, just not good for heavy things, it was alright for small less demanding tasks.
i had a Pentium II 300Mhz with 128mb that ran XP really well, just not good for heavy things, it was alright for small less demanding tasks.
#5
VROSA
-
- Global Moderator
-
- 2,043 posts
Ghost Member
- Location:Belo Horizonte - Minas Gerais - Brazil
- Interests:Hardware, Software, Alphas and Betas, OS Mods, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Linux, Games, Fun, Friends.
- Country:Brazil
Posted 02 February 2006 - 01:14 PM
Pentium 200 MMX @ 233 MHz | 192 MB -> After booting everything OK
Celeron 300 | 192 or 256 MB ??? -> Always slow, I prefer the Pentium MMX
The record (not mine): Intel CPU underclocked @ 8 MHz | 20 MB RAM
Celeron 300 | 192 or 256 MB ??? -> Always slow, I prefer the Pentium MMX
The record (not mine): Intel CPU underclocked @ 8 MHz | 20 MB RAM
Edited by vrosa x64, 02 February 2006 - 01:14 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
