Jump to content


PDC Windows7: anybody try it yet?


  • Please log in to reply
128 replies to this topic

#91 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 04 November 2008 - 02:15 AM

Unlocked features done :)

Attached File  win7unlock.png   976.06K   6 downloads

#92 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,847 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 04 November 2008 - 02:16 AM

View Posteniparadoxgma, on Nov 3 2008, 07:04 PM, said:

And THAT'S one thing I forgot to do. If I unplug the drive it's on (it's a separate physical drive) will I still have issues with my booting my other operating system?

yep. the bcd has taken hold of your boot files...

#93 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,847 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 04 November 2008 - 02:18 AM

well, w/o skype, i might as well head back to the xp partition...

#94 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 04 November 2008 - 02:27 AM

Quote

yep. the bcd has taken hold of your boot files...

Good thing about installing 'Virtually' :), nothing like that to worry about, plus 'save machine states' for testing software that ain't gonna work or cock things up in the process :giggle:

#95 eniparadoxgma

eniparadoxgma

    Thomas S. Arashikage

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 794 posts
  • Country:USA

Posted 04 November 2008 - 06:01 AM

View Postm.oreilly, on Nov 3 2008, 09:16 PM, said:

yep. the bcd has taken hold of your boot files...

SOB!!!

There any after-the-fact fixes I can toss in there somewhere? Last time this happened I had to redo..............everything. :)

#96 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,847 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 04 November 2008 - 06:12 AM

hook it back up
install vista boot pro on the "good" drive/os
choose "legacy" boot loader
breath deeply

#97 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,847 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 04 November 2008 - 06:13 AM

heck, i'm a gonna do that right now...

#98 eniparadoxgma

eniparadoxgma

    Thomas S. Arashikage

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 794 posts
  • Country:USA

Posted 05 November 2008 - 01:59 AM

View Postm.oreilly, on Nov 4 2008, 01:12 AM, said:

hook it back up
install vista boot pro on the "good" drive/os
choose "legacy" boot loader
breath deeply


Thanks, Mosephus. Worked like a charm.

So if I want to boot 7 now, do I pick that hard drive as the boot device or do I have to reset the option in Boot Pro? (curious)

:)

#99 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,847 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 05 November 2008 - 02:58 AM

if you had your other drive connected at the time of the windows7 install, you just might have to reset the boot to vista loader, as the vista loader was responsible for both oses to boot.

#100 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,847 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 11 November 2008 - 05:14 PM

i have to say i'm much more impressed w/the 32bit version; it "works'', there are more things that are functional. and there is something about 7...it seems 'quiet' (that sounds weird...), as if the gui is more stable, and whatever is under the hood is staying under the hood, as if they were insulated from one another, working away quietly...ok, i got 3 hours sleep last night; what do you expect :blink: :cc_surrender:

#101 Nvyseal

Nvyseal

    Chairman of the Board

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,821 posts
  • Location:From the whatever it is, Pluto
  • Country:USA

Posted 11 November 2008 - 05:21 PM

I think its because drivers are working in parallel and services only load and run when called upon

#102 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,847 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 11 November 2008 - 05:26 PM

View PostNvyseal, on Nov 11 2008, 09:21 AM, said:

I think its because drivers are working in parallel and services only load and run when called upon

that would explain it :cc_surrender:

#103 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 11 November 2008 - 05:44 PM

View Postm.oreilly, on Nov 11 2008, 05:14 PM, said:

i have to say i'm much more impressed w/the 32bit version; it "works'', there are more things that are functional. and there is something about 7...it seems 'quiet' (that sounds weird...), as if the gui is more stable, and whatever is under the hood is staying under the hood, as if they were insulated from one another, working away quietly...ok, i got 3 hours sleep last night; what do you expect :RJsPC: :blink:


Beginning to see sense at last :cc_surrender: Now you know why I run 32bit XP 24/7 :voodoog:


:voodoog:

#104 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,847 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 11 November 2008 - 05:49 PM

hehe, if this were x64, i wouldn't look back, but they left out/didn't have the functionality going on w/ the x64 version as yet. it will get there :cc_surrender:

#105 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,847 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 11 November 2008 - 05:51 PM

oh, have you tried that watermark removal trick? it didn't work w/x64 version as i recall.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users