Jump to content


Bad Memory for DDR2


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#16 RedInferno

RedInferno

    Your mom

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,584 posts
  • Location:What's it to ya, bub?
  • Country:North America

Posted 14 November 2005 - 09:47 PM

Yeah...those certifications cost a LOt...

#17 Visentinel

Visentinel

    Established Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 999 posts
  • Location:NSW Australia

Posted 15 November 2005 - 10:36 AM

View PostBlueScreenOfDeath, on Nov 10 2005, 06:35 AM, said:

right now DDR2 can provide almost 8000mb/per sec , it would be dumb for amd not to jump on the bandwagon with ddr400 and 500 only providing 4000-5000 mb a second. The cas ratings look high but their not ...a rating of 4-4-4-12 is actually like 2-2-2-6 which is low class, ddr2 is a new breed and does more cycles per clock than normal ddr so its not a bad thing but i think AMD was waiting for their cards to line up before they jumped aboard.


:P

LoL man DDR 500 and 550 scores 7 to 8.5 gigabytes/sec
Its PC3200 and PC 3700 that score 4 to 5 gigabytes/sec
What you said doesn't make sense anyways because Benchmarks using PC3200 - DDR 400 on Athlon64's Score 6.x Gigabytes/sec so imagine what DDR500 CAN do :baaasmiley:

Dual Channel offcourse, but DDR2 all runs in Dual Channel Aswell.

Edited by Visentinel, 15 November 2005 - 10:40 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users