Which works for you?
I prefer Server 2003 myself, but it would be interesting to hear what you prefer!
0
Which one...
Started by
Neon
, Oct 24 2005 12:16 PM
25 replies to this topic
#2
Leo
-
- Members
-
- 152 posts
Advanced Member
- Country:help me out here.....
Posted 24 October 2005 - 02:32 PM
Windows XP sp2
I´ts the most stable thing I´v ever seen from Microsoft.
My installation is allmost 1 year old now and it´s running like a new installation.
I hope Vista will be atleast the same.......or even better??
:rolleyes:
I´ts the most stable thing I´v ever seen from Microsoft.
My installation is allmost 1 year old now and it´s running like a new installation.
I hope Vista will be atleast the same.......or even better??
:rolleyes:
#3
m.oreilly
-
- Admin
-
- 8,847 posts
rog'er wilco
- Country:lower uncton
Posted 24 October 2005 - 06:07 PM
xp for workstation (photoshop, etc.), but vista 5219 for surfing and fun .
.
#4
ShadowFox
-
- Members
-
- 4,969 posts
High Priest
- Location:Tempe, AZ
- Interests:An abundance :P
- Country:United States
Posted 24 October 2005 - 06:10 PM
I use Server 2003/XP as a workstation and I use Fedora Core 4 as a server
#5
Mr Bad Guy
-
- Members
-
- 365 posts
No more Mr Nice Guy!
- Location:Manchester
- Interests:Football, music, movies (cinemas), friends, girls.
- Country:United Kingdom, England
Posted 24 October 2005 - 11:23 PM
I dunno much about computers so I stick to Windows... lol...
#7
gamer_pro_2000
-
- Members
-
- 108 posts
Advanced Member
- Location:Michigan, USA
- Country:United States
Posted 25 October 2005 - 03:05 PM
I use Linux. Although I don't know a lot about it, yet, I'm learning more and more about how it clicks. I also love the free development tools for Java, C++, and other languges in there. You can build just about anything wih it. My distro is the Fedora Core 4.
#8
Visentinel
-
- Members
-
- 999 posts
Established Member
- Location:NSW Australia
Posted 25 October 2005 - 09:33 PM
Windows 2003 Advanced Server - for the server
Windows 2000 Pro - For the Workstations.
Windows 2000 Pro - For the Workstations.
#9
tnctx02
-
- Members
-
- 338 posts
Texas Problem Child
- Location:The Lone Star State
- Interests:Working on my trucks, and building pc's for friends.
- Country:Texas
Posted 25 October 2005 - 10:08 PM
Haven't much exposure to Linux yet, but have used Server 2000 at work for years. Would have to stick with windows for now.
#10
Neon
-
- Members
-
- 4,728 posts
Karl
- Country:Space
Posted 25 October 2005 - 10:50 PM
mmm i agree, nothing against linux but good old windows is familiar and has some consistency
#11
ShadowFox
-
- Members
-
- 4,969 posts
High Priest
- Location:Tempe, AZ
- Interests:An abundance :P
- Country:United States
Posted 26 October 2005 - 03:33 AM
But Linux is the greatest Besides... It's fun to learn something new!
Besides... It's fun to learn something new!
#12
RedInferno
-
- Members
-
- 2,584 posts
Your mom
- Location:What's it to ya, bub?
- Country:North America
Posted 26 October 2005 - 04:31 PM
I like windows, and it works for me...but I also like experimenting with linux..and YES, I like Macs.
#13
ShadowFox
-
- Members
-
- 4,969 posts
High Priest
- Location:Tempe, AZ
- Interests:An abundance :P
- Country:United States
Posted 26 October 2005 - 06:26 PM
Traitor
#14
error51
-
- Newsposter
-
- 459 posts
Elite Newsposter
- Location:127.0.0.1
- Country:USA
Posted 28 October 2005 - 03:39 AM
Every company I have ever worked for has used Windows Server 2000 or 2003 and it has always performed perfectly for me. I wouldn't use anything else.
#15
ShadowFox
-
- Members
-
- 4,969 posts
High Priest
- Location:Tempe, AZ
- Interests:An abundance :P
- Country:United States
Posted 28 October 2005 - 03:43 AM
I can't get it to work properly for me... people can't access my website.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
