Jump to content


- - - - -

Windows XP SP3 Specifics Revealed


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 10 October 2007 - 12:35 AM

images/news/windows.jpgIf you have recently found yourself yelling “Down with Vista! Where’s my XP SP3?”, you’ll be happy to know Microsoft hasn’t forgotten users of its currently most popular OS. Over the last few weeks, the software giant has provided XP downgrades for unhappy Vista customers, announced that Windows XP sales would be extended to June 30, 2008, released a new build of Internet Explorer 7.0 for Windows XP that doesn't require product activation, and released a Service Pack 3 beta to a select group of testers. Vista may be the next big thing, but the gap between the two operating systems has created more problems than Microsoft would have hoped for. Thankfully, the company has decided against pushing Vista at all costs and (hold your breath MS haters) is listening to its customers.

The latest official 334.92 MB SP3 beta download is labelled as build 3205. Would you honestly be surprised if I told you a newer build has already been leaked? Reportedly, the aforementioned SP3 build contains 1,073 hotfixes and patches; 114 of which are security related. SP3 also adds four major features to the Windows XP operating system:

* a new activation scheme which will not require a product key during installation
* a new Network Access Protection Module first featured in Windows Vista
* a Microsoft Kernel Mode Cryptographics Module
* a Black Hole Router detection algorithm

DailyTech


#2 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,854 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 10 October 2007 - 03:43 AM

i'm sorry buddy, really am...i decided to check out xp after running rtm vista for most of the last year. i can't cope: vista is way more stable. drm is everywhere now. after going through the rigorous motions to set up xp once again, mandriva linux would be a far better choice, if you don't wanna vista, that is...

#3 Christopholofigus

Christopholofigus

    NQA-1

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,090 posts
  • Location:West Richland, WA
  • Interests:Holy CRAPBALLS! I totally remember this place!
  • Country:USA

Posted 10 October 2007 - 05:58 AM

:blink: Yea, i'm addicted to Veeesta as well. Hey, it finally brought me back to the x64 bit realm. I have had fewer problems with Vista x64 than any MS build as of yet...yeah yeah, i know..."hey Chris, you should try XP x64 again". You know, maybe. But i doubt i will play the XP x64 record ever again.

It is sheathed, bubbled wrapped and on the shelf.

#4 hog

hog

    official linguist

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,302 posts
  • Location:Montreal area, QC
  • Country:Canada

Posted 10 October 2007 - 04:16 PM

View Postm.oreilly, on Oct 9 2007, 11:43 PM, said:

i'm sorry buddy, really am...i decided to check out xp after running rtm vista for most of the last year. i can't cope: vista is way more stable. drm is everywhere now. after going through the rigorous motions to set up xp once again, mandriva linux would be a far better choice, if you don't wanna vista, that is...
After trying Vista I went back to XP cause there was no driver for my wireless adapter. Now I'm getting random BSOD's telling me the error comes from the wireless driver... Now D-Link has released the driver for Vista so I'm thinking about trying it out. And since I have a DX10 video card I'll have to upgrade sometime anyway. And now you say Vista is more stable for you? Maybe it would be the answer to my BSOD's... There's no driver for Linux so it's a no for Mandriva. Well, I think I have no choice but to look around the world of torrents tonight!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users