Jump to content


- - - - -

Windows 7 build 7000 64-bit version hits torrent sites


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Nvyseal

Nvyseal

    Chairman of the Board

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,821 posts
  • Location:From the whatever it is, Pluto
  • Country:USA

Posted 07 January 2009 - 08:08 PM

images/news/windows.jpgAlmost two weeks after Windows 7 build 7000 32-bit was leaked, the 64-bit version (7000.0.081212-1400_client_en-us_Ultimate-GB1CULXFRE_EN_DVD.ISO) has hit torrent sites. The first 7xxx build marks the entrance of Windows 7 into beta phase (6xxx builds were pre-beta builds) and so when the 32-bit version leaked, it was pirated by tens of thousands of users. Build 7000 was compiled on December 12, 2008, at 2:00PM, and many believe this is the build that Microsoft will be giving its testers. A public beta is also expected to be announced at the CES 2009 preshow tonight, though it's not clear when the actual download will be available (but it should arrive before or on Friday).

If the 64-bit build is anything like the 32-bit, performance should be quite high. Keep in mind though, build 7000 has an MP3 corruption bug, though a patch should be released any day now. This second leak is yet another slap in the face to testers who have been patiently for something to test (although select testers have received early builds), though the good news is that they won't have to deal with the headache of corrupted MP3 files once they get Beta 1.

Read On


#2 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 07 January 2009 - 08:44 PM

Hmm......to grab or not to grab? :bluerip:

*Edit*

It's been upped by Orbit30, so I'm trusting it as legit, as he is the one who does all the fixes for Windows 7 :rofl_mini:

#3 os collector

os collector

    2nd Innings

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 178 posts
  • Location:IND
  • Interests:programming, Reverse Engineering, Writing tutorials
  • Country:india

Posted 07 January 2009 - 08:54 PM

finally after a long time we got x64

#4 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 07 January 2009 - 08:56 PM

Yup, seems just fine :rofl_mini:

Posted Image

Posted Image

#5 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,854 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 07 January 2009 - 11:27 PM

downing now... :rofl_mini:

#6 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,854 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 08 January 2009 - 01:43 AM

30min to go...

#7 banj0

banj0

    American Idle

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,537 posts
  • Location:Detroit
  • Country:States

Posted 08 January 2009 - 08:08 PM

Scara, is it using 1710mb of memory just on idle? If so, that scares the crap out of me.

#8 stormrosson

stormrosson

    Established Member

  • Global Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,249 posts
  • Location:Silver City ,New Mexico
  • Interests:stuff
  • Country:yes

Posted 08 January 2009 - 10:56 PM

:rofl_mini: yeah I'm usin 1.38 GB with FF running :bluerip:

#9 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 08 January 2009 - 11:19 PM

View Postbanj0, on Jan 8 2009, 08:08 PM, said:

Scara, is it using 1710mb of memory just on idle? If so, that scares the crap out of me.

It's not 'using' as such, but is exactly the same as Vista, it's 'caching' all available RAM. I have about 4.5Gb cached out of my 6Gb total. Both Vista and Win7 will cache whatever you have, its the strange way this OS works.

#10 banj0

banj0

    American Idle

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,537 posts
  • Location:Detroit
  • Country:States

Posted 09 January 2009 - 02:12 AM

Weird--I ran Vista for a decent amount of time (finally came back to X64) and never noticed that. Thx.

#11 eniparadoxgma

eniparadoxgma

    Thomas S. Arashikage

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 794 posts
  • Country:USA

Posted 09 January 2009 - 03:36 PM

View Postbanj0, on Jan 8 2009, 09:12 PM, said:

Weird--I ran Vista for a decent amount of time (finally came back to X64) and never noticed that. Thx.


Yeah, that freaked me out when using Vista64 at first too. I googled around and found out that it wasn't necessarily "using" all the RAM, juts caching it for faster use or some crap.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users