Jump to content


Top 10 Reasons to Install Windows Server 2003 SP2


  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

#31 bluerip

bluerip

    BS Meter embedded, BS attached

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 741 posts
  • Location:Arnoldland
  • Interests:All things SciFi, Hidden Science,& Hiddin Truth
  • Country:& western, jazz, rock, all

Posted 25 May 2007 - 03:05 AM

It does make one wonder why a major company would release a major product like this intended to be a mainstream OS in such a crippled state as to have such unknown, limited compatability. A risk I wouldn't take. It only seems possible in the event of no real compatition. Otherwise with supposedly so much at risk businesswise it would be insane. And yet ... :lol:

Edited by bluerip, 25 May 2007 - 03:06 AM.


#32 USM

USM

    GRIM DEVILDOG

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 315 posts
  • Location:Au Gres, Michigan USA
  • Interests:Computers, Women, Hard Rock and Fishing of course!
  • Country:USA

Posted 25 May 2007 - 04:01 AM

All I have to say is I was very impressed with the graphics the first time I installed a Vista beta. But my impression eneded there. I would never dog anyone that has had luck with Vista. I on the other hand (like WFO) do not have the time to make it work as it should. WFO I have recently been experimenting with Xubuntu for folding purposes only. You might want to look into it. This distro is way less demanding on resources than Ubuntu. Just a thought. :lol:

#33 bluerip

bluerip

    BS Meter embedded, BS attached

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 741 posts
  • Location:Arnoldland
  • Interests:All things SciFi, Hidden Science,& Hiddin Truth
  • Country:& western, jazz, rock, all

Posted 25 May 2007 - 04:59 AM

View PostUSM, on May 24 2007, 09:01 PM, said:

All I have to say is I was very impressed with the graphics the first time I installed a Vista beta. But my impression eneded there. I would never dog anyone that has had luck with Vista. I on the other hand (like WFO) do not have the time to make it work as it should. WFO I have recently been experimenting with Xubuntu for folding purposes only. You might want to look into it. This distro is way less demanding on resources than Ubuntu. Just a thought. :lol:

googling it now. Just curious, do you pronounce that 'zoo bun too' or 'ex u bun too'?

#34 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,771 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 25 May 2007 - 05:12 AM

View Postbluerip, on May 24 2007, 09:59 PM, said:

googling it now. Just curious, do you pronounce that 'zoo bun too' or 'ex u bun too'?

http://larrytheopensourceguy.wordpress.com...nounce-xubuntu/

#35 bluerip

bluerip

    BS Meter embedded, BS attached

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 741 posts
  • Location:Arnoldland
  • Interests:All things SciFi, Hidden Science,& Hiddin Truth
  • Country:& western, jazz, rock, all

Posted 25 May 2007 - 05:18 AM

View Postm.oreilly, on May 24 2007, 10:12 PM, said:


I think I'll opt for the Zulu...clickubuntu. hehe, that was a fun read. thanks, mo!

#36 USM

USM

    GRIM DEVILDOG

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 315 posts
  • Location:Au Gres, Michigan USA
  • Interests:Computers, Women, Hard Rock and Fishing of course!
  • Country:USA

Posted 25 May 2007 - 01:55 PM

Well I was pronouncing it ex-ubuntu, but I guess according to the article it is zoo-buntu. Hmm I still like ex-ubuntu better! :lol:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users