Jump to content


- - - - -

Is our Internet future in danger?


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Nvyseal

Nvyseal

    Chairman of the Board

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,830 posts
  • Location:From the whatever it is, Pluto
  • Country:USA

Posted 11 November 2008 - 09:08 PM

images/news/internet.jpgSigns point to a bandwidth shortage, and avoiding that may mean you'll pay more for broadband usage.

The digital Disneyland of the future -- where we freely work and play online -- may be at risk. Why? Because, some argue, broadband carriers can't support it. The Internet's "free ride" culture has led to more people downloading gigabytes of data at practically no cost. Even if broadband infrastructure's capacity doubled or tripled, there's no avoiding the equivalent of an abrupt work stoppage.

There are signs of the free ride being nearly over. In the U.K., a million users are about to bump into "soft caps" for usage that their carriers imposed, according to consumer research group uSwitch. In the U.S., some carriers have also started imposing caps that customers have found out about only when they exceeded them in their inaccurately labeled "unlimited" plans. (These limits were hidden in the "unlimited" contracts' fine print.) Comcast, for example, now has a national cap of 256GB per month. And a few are experimenting with tiered pricing, where the more you use, the more you pay -- just like you do for electrical, gas, and water.

InfoWorld

Have we already reached the end of the Matrix?


#2 hog

hog

    official linguist

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,302 posts
  • Location:Montreal area, QC
  • Country:Canada

Posted 11 November 2008 - 11:38 PM

256GB/month is like heaven to me. I'm allowed 20GB downstream and 10GB upstream per month, having to pay some price per exceeding GB up to a maximum of 30$ more/month. There are other plans, but they cost like 100$/month, which is ridiculous. But we've talked about this before, haven't we? Anyways, they really have to invest in better infrastructure, this situation can't go on forever...

#3 Christopholofigus

Christopholofigus

    NQA-1

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,090 posts
  • Location:West Richland, WA
  • Interests:Holy CRAPBALLS! I totally remember this place!
  • Country:USA

Posted 12 November 2008 - 04:36 AM

:cc_surrender: Well, if it happens, I guess it means it will end my addiction to the net LOL. I can see it happening though. More and more are using the net, and with the size of hdds increasing, what is a gig to anyone anymore? Meh...time will tell.

#4 highlander

highlander

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 129 posts
  • Country:Puerto Rico

Posted 12 November 2008 - 01:16 PM

all they have to do is invest in usenet capabilities so no redundant data is sent through. Most big companies make really big dollars and the top tier people only think in uni dimensional strategies that hurt the customer and later on... themselves. Probably they will all get together and do the same thing.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users