Jump to content


- - - - -

When Windows Goes All 64-Bit


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 11 September 2008 - 02:12 PM

images/news/windows.jpg64-bit Windows is becoming more common and will eventually be the norm. Such transitions never go as smoothly as you'd like. Everyone, even Microsoft, is openly talking about Windows 7. I think that there will be a 32-bit edition of Windows 7, but I also think it may be the last such version of Windows, And I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft takes steps in it to encourage adoption of 64-bit Windows, moving us further on the path to a Windows 8, which may be entirely 64-bit.

There's a rule about Windows that most people never seem to appreciate fully: Every new version of Windows is designed for the next generation of hardware. When users upgrade XP to Vista on circa-2004 hardware and declare it sucky, they miss the point. This same effect is true of other operating systems to varying degrees; certainly it's true of MacOS, where they get to coordinate even more tightly. It's less true, I suppose, with Unix and variants because there's less of a partnership with hardware vendors.

A related important point about the cross-generational period is that upgrades just don't work as well as most preloaded installations. OEMs, at least in theory, can put a lot of work into getting their preloaded Windows and drivers to work optimally, while a user upgrading a previous version is likely to encounter tasks, identifying not only what should be running on the system but what should not, which they will have difficulty performing optimally.

eWeek


#2 VROSA

VROSA

    Ghost Member

  • Global Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,043 posts
  • Location:Belo Horizonte - Minas Gerais - Brazil
  • Interests:Hardware, Software, Alphas and Betas, OS Mods, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Linux, Games, Fun, Friends.
  • Country:Brazil

Posted 12 September 2008 - 12:57 AM

Quote

Every new version of Windows is designed for the next generation of hardware.

That's true if you wanna get the most from the new OS... but I've already installed Vista on a Pentium 3 w/ 640 MB of RAM and it worked, not smoothly, but worked.

I think that software makers have to encourage adoption of new technologies, but also have to respect the user that cant upgrade imediately.

:)

#3 talker

talker

    Being a Priest is not always easy.

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 840 posts
  • Location:Huntville, AL, USA
  • Interests:Ah lets see...gee, I know...computers.
  • Country:USA

Posted 12 September 2008 - 04:51 AM

I have Vista Home Premium x86 on a 3.06 P4 and 1024MB RAM. It performs wery well. A little slow, but very well. Stick in a USB drive and enable Ready Boost with 2GB and the slowness vanishes. Vista will run well on the older hardware but probably not something that Redmond and the OEMs would like to be plastered in the tech mags and forums... :)

#4 Blue

Blue

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 27 posts
  • Country:Denmark

Posted 12 September 2008 - 01:19 PM

vrosa x64 said:

but I've already installed Vista on a Pentium 3 w/ 640 MB of RAM and it worked, not smoothly, but worked.

Yeah, I remember how I tried to run Longhorn on my Pentium 2. I managed to install it, but using it was just a pain because everything lagged so much.

scaramonga said:

Every new version of Windows is designed for the next generation of hardware.

But I agree to this. I tried to run Vista on my previous laptop, which was designed for windows XP, and the result was a system that worked slow. The next laptop I got was designed for Vista, and well it worked fine. But I wonder if that laptop and the one I have now, will be able to run Windows 7, I sure hope so :)

#5 hog

hog

    official linguist

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,302 posts
  • Location:Montreal area, QC
  • Country:Canada

Posted 12 September 2008 - 01:34 PM

View PostBlue, on Sep 12 2008, 09:19 AM, said:

But I wonder if that laptop and the one I have now, will be able to run Windows 7, I sure hope so :)
Considering they are supposedly aiming for high performance, I guess/hope they will.

#6 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,872 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 13 September 2008 - 04:46 AM

um, i dunno why they don't already (go x64 totally). drm can be injected by the mob that does this sort of thing, and ap developers have had a good 3 years in the windows x86 amd64 environment to...develop. you can run legacy in vm, if needed (granted your vm client plays along). i wonder if windows7 will have a virtual nook for legacy...




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users