

What a Q6600 can actually do!!!
Started by
chriso_86
, Jul 26 2007 09:23 PM
25 replies to this topic
#16
Posted 11 December 2007 - 05:21 AM
Dang I wish mine ran that cool. I don't like mine to much.
#17
Posted 11 December 2007 - 05:59 AM
CPU: Q6600 @ 3,40 GHz (FSB 378 x 9 ; 45º - 50º on load ; 26º - 33º idle)
GPU: 8800GTS @ 650 / 1800 MHz (70º - 80º on load ; ~60º idle)
DDR2: 946 MHz (5-5-5-17)
Vcore: 1.3500 V (max.)
FSBT: 1,40 V
MCH: 1,65 V
ICH: 1,20 V (max.)
* extra fan for mobo and GPU
* CPU posts @ 3,60 GHz (FSB 400 x 9) but fails booting OS !!!
3DMark06: 11074
Super Pi (1M): 16 s
Prime95 torture test: stable
GPU: 8800GTS @ 650 / 1800 MHz (70º - 80º on load ; ~60º idle)
DDR2: 946 MHz (5-5-5-17)
Vcore: 1.3500 V (max.)
FSBT: 1,40 V
MCH: 1,65 V
ICH: 1,20 V (max.)
* extra fan for mobo and GPU
* CPU posts @ 3,60 GHz (FSB 400 x 9) but fails booting OS !!!
3DMark06: 11074
Super Pi (1M): 16 s
Prime95 torture test: stable


#18 Guest_scaramonga_*
Posted 11 December 2007 - 10:19 AM
They clock to 3GHz easy without adding any more Juice
so I just run mine 24/7 like that as temps are only 18 idle on water
Fast & very cool chips and when its 'lapped' its even better, as the IHS on some of these are very concave.



#19
Posted 13 February 2008 - 02:06 AM
well, i decided to try that there 3dmark 06 again. haven't tried since, well since 06
. i don't think it can tell what my cpus are, or test threading well, because it says i'm running a pentiumIII...
, so everything @ stock, i only get 10650...



#20
Posted 13 February 2008 - 03:32 AM
tried the pcmark (receiving another 10,000-ish score), and was completely outclassed by a chinese guy with a single quad consumer cpu @ over 5ghz, and his $75 onboard sata7200 rpm hitachi drive (his hdd scores were 500% higher than my hardware controller with two 150 raptors in raid0...i don't know if i really would trust these benches for anything but buying the stuff they advertise, as in the "get" buttons they so conveniently supply after your "score" is displayed). yep, my rig is a piece of sh1t according to the futuremark peeps, as they recommend i buy a core2 duo so i can compete, along with the $75 "super drive" hitachi 7200 rpm...
#21
Posted 13 February 2008 - 04:17 AM
m.oreilly, on Feb 12 2008, 10:32 PM, said:
tried the pcmark (receiving another 10,000-ish score), and was completely outclassed by a chinese guy with a single quad consumer cpu @ over 5ghz, and his $75 onboard sata7200 rpm hitachi drive (his hdd scores were 500% higher than my hardware controller with two 150 raptors in raid0...i don't know if i really would trust these benches for anything but buying the stuff they advertise, as in the "get" buttons they so conveniently supply after your "score" is displayed). yep, my rig is a piece of sh1t according to the futuremark peeps, as they recommend i buy a core2 duo so i can compete, along with the $75 "super drive" hitachi 7200 rpm...
#23
Posted 15 February 2008 - 02:12 AM
Which PC Mark? Vantage? Bleep! I'd upload my score but i keep getting "Internal Server error."
#26 Guest_scaramonga_*
Posted 15 February 2008 - 02:17 AM
See MO........
Your 2 crappy Xeon's cant keep up with my Q6600, get with it boy!
Your 2 crappy Xeon's cant keep up with my Q6600, get with it boy!

0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users