bluerip, on Jan 21 2008, 12:11 AM, said:
an insider leaked that the Bilderbergers intend Clinton to be president next.
Even if an apparent true believer(in the constitution) gets elected by some fluke of an honest vote...
Even if an apparent true believer(in the constitution) gets elected by some fluke of an honest vote...
I am not sure that I can concede the existance of a global Bildeberger type organization yet I will admit to some credence of a national (read United States) group. I don't feel that Clinton would be the pick of this group. I believe they need someone more pliable (usable) than Clinton can or will be. I have an opinion as to whom but will not state that here.
And as for an honest election, I fear that has not occurred since, perhaps, the election of Eisenhower in 1952. I am not a defeatist concerning American politics but have long feared that our single nor combined votes really mean little. There is enough coordination in this national organitzation to not allow an extreme landslide in the voting. A close vote is much easier to manipulate and to sell to the populace. Even were an "honest" candidate happen to make it into the Whitehouse it would be of little concern. There is enough influence outside the Whitehouse to more that run damage control and maintain the organization's background control. An "honest" or uncooperative President would be, at most, a minor inconvenience to the group. A democracy requires less power to control than a dictatorship. You allow the people to go about the motions of democracy and they are satisfied (see sig quote). If an individual or group goes too far, an agency like Homeland Security will move in to redirect or even silence the problem. As most of you know, I have had a run in with Homeland Security concerning things that I have written not being allowed to be published.
Well, I guess it is time to yeild this soapbox to someone else. Please consider that these opinions are mine and don't neccesarily, in anyway, represent the views of the forum or anyone connected to the forum. These views I voice in print and verbally when I see a discussion that warrants the opportunity...talker.
Edited by talker, 22 January 2008 - 01:04 AM.











