Jump to content


- - - - -

AMD second quarter: revenues up, profits down


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Nvyseal

Nvyseal

    Chairman of the Board

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,830 posts
  • Location:From the whatever it is, Pluto
  • Country:USA

Posted 20 July 2007 - 10:57 PM

images/news/amd.jpgAMD reported its second-quarter results yesterday, and as expected, posted heavy losses. For the second quarter of 2007, AMD said it ended up $600 million, or $1.09 per share, in the red on revenues of $1.38 billion. That's a harsh reversal from the 18¢ per share profit the company made during the second quarter of 2006.

Of the $600 million loss, $130 million was related to AMD's purchase of ATI, which AMD acquired last fall for $5.6 billion, along with severance costs, stock-compensation costs, and debt issuance charges.

Revenues were actually up over last year's figure of $1.22 billion (which makes sense given that this years revenues include ATI), and more importantly for AMD, the company's sales volumes grew during the quarter. Gross margins suffered, however, dropping from 57 percent during the second quarter of 2006 to 33 percent. That's what happens when you get caught in a price war against your main competitor and end up cutting prices to the bone. The situation has improved since the first quarter of 2007, with AMD's revenues up 12 percent quarter-over-quarter and gross margins up 5 percent.

arstechnica


#2 hog

hog

    official linguist

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,302 posts
  • Location:Montreal area, QC
  • Country:Canada

Posted 21 July 2007 - 01:08 AM

Revenues always going up, it's a good sign IMO. I'm no expert, mind you. I study linguistics, so numbers are not my friends really. :P I guess it shows that AMD is making some sacrifices to gain more market share over Intel partly by cutting its prices. Revenues going up means they sell more so I think that this strategy is working. Also with the improved Dresden plant they should be able to be even more competitive. We haven't seen the end of AMD yet. Well I hope not.

#3 Nvyseal

Nvyseal

    Chairman of the Board

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,830 posts
  • Location:From the whatever it is, Pluto
  • Country:USA

Posted 21 July 2007 - 04:02 AM

True in some cases, but if it costs you a buck to make, and you sell it for a buck, there is no profit. Profit is what is put back into R&D. You need a good profit in order to innovate. Now if AMD is liquidating the inventory that they have in order to invest into their new designs thats good, but if they are selling off their inventory to stay afloat, thats not so good.

#4 othman11

othman11

    head redneck

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPip
  • 227 posts
  • Location:St. Charles, Missouri
  • Country:US

Posted 21 July 2007 - 06:41 AM

As long as AMD keeps making (sales) gains in market share, it all good.

And after I get the quad intel going, I'll start a new AMD build....quad of course. ;) :P




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users