Jump to content


- - - - -

Intel to tell all about 96GB/s QuickPath interconnect


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 30 January 2008 - 03:37 PM

images/news/intel.jpgYou horrible cynics out there looked at Intel's mushy Montvale chip and scoffed. "That's the end of the Itanic." Ah, but there's a fresh monster on the horizon known as Tukwila, and systems based on that puppy should fly if its brand new QuickPath interconnect arrives as expected. Next week Intel will disclose details on QuickPath at the International Solid State Circuits Conference in San Francisco.

What will Intel say? Well, according to the conference program, showgoers will hear about an Itanium processor is implemented in 8M 65nm CMOS and measures 21.5×32.5mm2. The processor has four dual-threaded cores, a system interface and 30MB of cache. Quickpath high-speed links enable peak processor-to-processor bandwidth of 96GB/s and peak memory bandwidth of 34GB/s

The Reg


#2 Scuba

Scuba

    I see you!

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 292 posts
  • Country:usa

Posted 31 January 2008 - 04:24 AM

Wow. And the race between IBM and Intel gets closer :rofl_mini: . Faster, Smaller, More Powerful; either way we are the ones who will benifit. YAY technology!

#3 TheBearLT

TheBearLT

    Established Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 781 posts
  • Country:Lithuania

Posted 31 January 2008 - 12:01 PM

Nah, IBM is Unreachable.. he he :rofl_mini:

#4 BlueScreenOfDeath

BlueScreenOfDeath

    ~* Hardware & Beta Guru *~

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 479 posts
  • Location:Little Rock, AR
  • Country:USA

Posted 31 January 2008 - 09:52 PM

View PostScuba, on Jan 30 2008, 11:24 PM, said:

Wow. And the race between IBM and Intel gets closer :rofl_mini: . Faster, Smaller, More Powerful; either way we are the ones who will benifit. YAY technology!

when did you become able to afford an Itanium CPU :mellow:

#5 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,872 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 31 January 2008 - 10:48 PM

Quote

...and systems based on that puppy should fly if its brand new QuickPath interconnect arrives as expected
this will be the benefit. i wonder how long we have to wait after server platforms based on intel's version of hypertransport have arrived 'til we see the consumer stuff...

#6 Scuba

Scuba

    I see you!

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 292 posts
  • Country:usa

Posted 01 February 2008 - 04:32 AM

View PostBlueScreenOfDeath, on Jan 31 2008, 03:52 PM, said:

when did you become able to afford an Itanium CPU :g:

A man can dream cant he...

Plus I just like to see technology grow, and nothing says "lets make it better" than someone else trying to do the same thing you are.

#7 BlueScreenOfDeath

BlueScreenOfDeath

    ~* Hardware & Beta Guru *~

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 479 posts
  • Location:Little Rock, AR
  • Country:USA

Posted 01 February 2008 - 07:58 PM

only downside to owning one of these is its built on the IA64 architecture... which isnt the same as x86-64




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users