Jump to content


- - - - -

Stealth Windows update prevents XP repair


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Nvyseal

Nvyseal

    Chairman of the Board

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,830 posts
  • Location:From the whatever it is, Pluto
  • Country:USA

Posted 27 September 2007 - 06:54 PM

images/news/windows.jpgEver since the Redmond company's recent download of new support files for Windows Update, users of XP's repair function have been unable to install the latest 80 patches from Microsoft.

Repaired installations of XP can't be updated

Accounts of conflicts with XP's repair option came to our attention after Microsoft's "silent install" of Windows Update (WU) executable files, known as version 7.0.600.381, was reported in the Sept. 13 and 20 issues of the Windows Secrets Newsletter.

The trouble occurs when users reinstall XP's system files using the repair capability found on genuine XP CD-ROMs. (The feature is not present on "Restore CDs.") The repair option, which is typically employed when XP for some reason becomes unbootable, rolls many aspects of XP back to a pristine state. It wipes out many updates and patches and sets Internet Explorer back to the version that originally shipped with the operating system.

Normally, users who repair XP can easily download and install the latest patches, using the Automatic Updates control panel or navigating directly to Microsoft's Windows Update site.

However, after using the repair option from an XP CD-ROM, Windows Update now downloads and installs the new 7.0.600.381 executable files. Some WU executables aren't registered with the operating system, preventing Windows Update from working as intended. This, in turn, prevents Microsoft's 80 latest patches from installing — even if the patches successfully downloaded to the PC.

Read More @ Windows Secrets


#2 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,872 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 27 September 2007 - 07:49 PM

is that pants, or what?

#3 Nvyseal

Nvyseal

    Chairman of the Board

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,830 posts
  • Location:From the whatever it is, Pluto
  • Country:USA

Posted 27 September 2007 - 08:36 PM

I tell you, MS is out to break XP so users will be forced to use V.....

#4 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2007 - 12:22 AM

View PostNvyseal, on Sep 27 2007, 09:36 PM, said:

I tell you, MS is out to break XP so users will be forced to use V.....

Well.....they gotta get the sales in somehow :talker:

#5 Tweak

Tweak

    Established Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 674 posts
  • Country:US

Posted 28 September 2007 - 01:39 AM

So even using http://windowsupdate.62nds.com/ for updates wouldn't help, nice work, I think it is a secret plan to move people faster to Veesta, the cheesiest of OSes.

#6 WFO

WFO

    Super Adv. Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 569 posts
  • Country:USA

Posted 28 September 2007 - 02:05 AM

I've never had to do a repair install because I always use Acronis TI to image disks before any changes. :talker: If I did a repair install and couldn't update, I'd use KAV, BoClean, my spyware programs and not give 2 s__ts about Windows Fuckdate. :P That's just me though. A license paid for is a license forever. :talker: Shiet. It may even move another box to Linux. At this point it's too close too call. ;) :roadrunner:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users