m.oreilly, on Jun 17 2008, 09:52 PM, said:
wow, the older version is way faster here. it takes 5 seconds to load any page of FF3, yet the earlier version is instantaneous. weird.
2
Firefox 3 Download Day Starts Today, June 17th 2008
Started by
Guest_scaramonga_*
, Jun 17 2008 11:15 AM
96 replies to this topic
#46
Nvyseal
-
- Administrator
-
- 9,821 posts
Chairman of the Board
- Location:From the whatever it is, Pluto
- Country:USA
Posted 18 June 2008 - 04:56 AM
What ever floats your boat
#47
banj0
-
- Sponsor
-
- 1,537 posts
American Idle
- Location:Detroit
- Country:States
Posted 18 June 2008 - 04:57 AM
And, just after posting, I find that the WMP plugin is unavailable for 3.0. 
Time to revert back.
Time to revert back.
#48
Nvyseal
-
- Administrator
-
- 9,821 posts
Chairman of the Board
- Location:From the whatever it is, Pluto
- Country:USA
Posted 18 June 2008 - 05:01 AM
banj0, on Jun 17 2008, 09:57 PM, said:
And, just after posting, I find that the WMP plugin is unavailable for 3.0. Time to revert back.
Time to revert back.#49
m.oreilly
-
- Admin
-
- 8,847 posts
rog'er wilco
- Country:lower uncton
Posted 18 June 2008 - 05:02 AM
Nvyseal, on Jun 17 2008, 09:56 PM, said:
What ever floats your boat
#50
banj0
-
- Sponsor
-
- 1,537 posts
American Idle
- Location:Detroit
- Country:States
Posted 18 June 2008 - 05:12 AM
Nvyseal, on Jun 18 2008, 01:01 AM, said:
Now you know why you run it side by side. I have to do that with IE especially when visiting MS sites and needing PDF files. But remember, today is the first day out. so plugins will catch up
Yeah, that's what I do. By revert back, I didn't mean uninstall, just launch 2.0.0.14.
I iz smaht wits interwebz 2 man!!
#51
hog
-
- Sponsor
-
- 1,302 posts
official linguist
- Location:Montreal area, QC
- Country:Canada
Posted 18 June 2008 - 05:50 AM
Uber fast! 
Sorry MO
Sorry MO
#52
highlander
-
- Members
-
- 129 posts
Advanced Member
- Country:Puerto Rico
Posted 18 June 2008 - 06:29 AM
Yeah sorry MO.. for plugins.. Disable compatibility and you are set. I really like FF3. I can't believe an open source can actually be a better browser than MS is. I wonder if they start doing an open source OS if it will be better than Windows.... Oh wait... Linux is OS OS and its a pill.. NM!
haha
Anyways.. I really like it... to disable compatibility on the about:config just add extensionscheckCompatiblity to false. and most of them should work fine.
Anyways... Sorry MO
haha
Anyways.. I really like it... to disable compatibility on the about:config just add extensionscheckCompatiblity to false. and most of them should work fine.
Anyways... Sorry MO
#53 Guest_scaramonga_*
Guest_scaramonga_*
-
- Guests
Posted 18 June 2008 - 01:34 PM
Yup......all my extensions working fine and blazing fast browsing 
XP of course.
XP of course.
#54
Roadrunner
-
- Sponsor
-
- 672 posts
Established Member
- Location:Irvine, california
- Country:USA
Posted 18 June 2008 - 02:59 PM
I really didn't think I'd see much difference, but it is much faster now.
No problems yet.
No problems yet.
#55 Guest_scaramonga_*
Guest_scaramonga_*
-
- Guests
Posted 18 June 2008 - 05:42 PM
Remember to tweak network settings for maximum speed, such as turning on pipelining etc., as in version 2
Type about:config in http bar, set as follows:
Type about:config in http bar, set as follows:
Edited by scaramonga, 18 June 2008 - 05:43 PM.
#56
Tweak
-
- Members
-
- 674 posts
Established Member
- Country:US
Posted 18 June 2008 - 11:39 PM
So out of the box it is unfinished and slower than Opera and you have to download more to add functionality that is a built-in available option with a default install of Opera, a browers that is both complete and even admittedly faster, yep, confirmed it themselves, Opera is indeed the better choice. Thanks for the reminder of what I already knew Dave, and FF developers as well.
#57
Nvyseal
-
- Administrator
-
- 9,821 posts
Chairman of the Board
- Location:From the whatever it is, Pluto
- Country:USA
Posted 19 June 2008 - 12:07 AM
Tweak, on Jun 18 2008, 04:39 PM, said:
So out of the box it is unfinished and slower than Opera and you have to download more to add functionality that is a built-in available option with a default install of Opera, a browers that is both complete and even admittedly faster, yep, confirmed it themselves, Opera is indeed the better choice. Thanks for the reminder of what I already knew Dave, and FF developers as well.
Opera is not as secure, nor is safari for windows
#58
RJsPC
-
- Sponsor
-
- 435 posts
Sponge Bob Guru Pants
- Location:Santa Cruz CA
- Country:USA
Posted 19 June 2008 - 12:12 AM
Oh yeah, well, and further more, and so on, so there, because, see
#59
m.oreilly
-
- Admin
-
- 8,847 posts
rog'er wilco
- Country:lower uncton
Posted 19 June 2008 - 02:36 AM
can anybody running server '08 x64 run the ff3 and let me know if it is a piece of doodoo, like it runs on my system?
#60
talker
-
- Sponsor
-
- 840 posts
Being a Priest is not always easy.
- Location:Huntville, AL, USA
- Interests:Ah lets see...gee, I know...computers.
- Country:USA
Posted 19 June 2008 - 02:50 AM
m.oreilly, on Jun 18 2008, 09:36 PM, said:
can anybody running server '08 x64 run the ff3 and let me know if it is a piece of doodoo, like it runs on my system?
OK Mo, I have installed FF3 in Server '08 x64. I will run it in some real time testing and let you know what I discover. The system is the one in the sig except there is 8 GB RAM instead of 4 GB...
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
