Quote
exactly, i dont think they would translate the Bible into something different than what it was
King James did exactly that. There were numerous words and phrases that had no English equivalents, so King James replaced then with what he thought would fit. Furthermore, if you look at newer translations (New International Version, Living Bible, etc.) they are based off of the King James version instead of older versions. Also, King James didn't rely on theologians to translate the bible.
Let's not forget that the reason the Anglican Church was formed in England was so that the King could get a divorce and legally remarry, which the Catholic Church prohibited. In that case, an entirely new church was created.
Quote
Uh, actually, many ppl hold these values, they aren't just his. I have similar stances to Red and so does many other ppl. And morals have been known to change in ppl, with circumstances.
You're still mixing the two together. People constantly reassess their value hierarchy, as specific situations may place more worth on a given value than others. For example, if you have to choose between a noght out with the guys playing poker and spending time at home with your family, it's essentially a question of which one (time with friends or time with family) you value more at that particular time. If you've been working long hours all week and have barely seen your family all week, then you might elect to stay home. However, if you've been at home all week, whether a vacation or to take care of a sick family member, you might elect to go out with the guys.
Morals, on the other hand, are not weighed/analyzed in the same manner as values. Please note that I never said morals didn't change, just that it's much more difficult to adjust one's moral code once fully developed.